- #The godfather ps3 parental update
- #The godfather ps3 parental android
- #The godfather ps3 parental software
So I'm afraid to say I think the upvoted comment you refer to is incorrect. However the direct assignment in your second example doesn't do any command subsitution, so works as expected. Specifically command substitution operators $() and backticks will strip trailing newlines from the command output. I think this answer should explain the behavior you are seeing.
#The godfather ps3 parental update
Update - changing my pseudo-comment to a real answer.
#The godfather ps3 parental software
There is PC software available in most cases. You will have to hunt a bit on the internet to gather all the information on how the configuration has to be done, though. Most of these tags are generally available for sale on-line. ICODE SLI(X)-S: can provide additional password protection to prevent overwriting.MIFARE DESFire: multiple authentication keys and access rights can be configured, including read-only access without keys.MIFARE Ultralight C: can provide additional password protection to prevent overwriting.
#The godfather ps3 parental android
NB: not all Android devices can access these! One key can be configured for read-only, while the other can be used to write the memory. MIFARE Classic: the memory sectors are protected by 2 keys.Some examples (all manufactured by NXP, as I am most familiar with those): These extra functions may include access control for writing, allowing the chip to be configured like you want. However, when you look at the chips inside the tags that actually implement the required NFC functionality, they often provide more functions. There is only makeReadOnly(), which in most cases makes the tag irreversibly read-only. So the Android API does not provide it either. The standard NFC Forum tag types for storing NDEF messages that Android supports have no specific functionality defined for this. It depends somewhat on the exact tags you will be using. So they named it not because it inherits from Holo, but because they wanted a name that describes it as 'the light version of Holo'. Now, looking at the default themes.xml, it seems that inherits from Theme.Light, and then all of the Holo stuff is specified manually in its description. AppTheme.TestTheme does not inherit from both parents at once. So parent="." seems to take definitely precedence. When parent="." is specified, it makes no difference when I remove the prefix or not. With parent="android:Theme.Light" removed, the screen is dark and fullscreen, so the TestTheme <- AppTheme (fullscreen) <- AppBaseTheme <- Theme (dark) hierarchy is in place.
When the parent="android:Theme.Light" attribute is specified, the window is white and not fullscreen - this means that the parent="." attribute takes precedence over the name prefix, and the hierarchy appears to be TestTheme <- Theme.Light (light) <- Theme (dark). Theme.Light makes the window background light instead of the default dark. AppTheme makes the window full-screen & not have a title bar. Resources file looks like I apply AppTheme.TestTheme to the activity in the manifest file. I've been wondering about this as well, so I wrote a simple test app to try it.